'Apeman' Letter Author
Is Not Human
The person who sent you the 'apeman' letter is not human himself in my opinion. He would not be tolerated at the NA meeting I go to. It is unfortunate that there are those kinds of people in this world. I myself have been attacked in a similar fashion. It was done more discreetly but the end result was similar. I hope you are doing well. Although I don't agree with most of what you believe I do read much of it so that I can understand what and how other people feel and believe. I do end up modifying my own beliefs by what I learn and understand.
From: "Positive Atheism" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Positive_Atheism_Letters_Section
Date: Sunday, July 02, 2000 9:34 PM
I remember you! I still have some of those old online mud-slinging sessions posted in Recovery Watch, especially: "You Don't Grant the Same Consideration to Other Paths"; "Same Playing Field: Censorship vs. Orwellian Steptalk"; "Name-Calling, Mud-Slinging, and AA-Bashing."
Almost all the attacks I endured in the Twelve Step programs were discreet. After enduring enough of them, though, I had been driven out of the program many times over. That was the reason I was willing to check out Rational Recovery when I heard about it. (I wouldn't have been interested had I been happy, now would I?)
Now, after twelve years, I have embarked upon a method of moderation based loosely on the way the Europeans (particularly the British) approach heavy drinking. So far, I've done well.
I did investigate Audrey Kishline's "Moderation Management" several years ago, and found it to be very wanting when it comes to both method and technique. It was more about letting people know that moderation is possible than it was about finding out if your are a candidate and, if so, how to pull it off -- and what signs to look for when trouble's a-brewin'.
Unfortunately, Kishline was convicted last week of two counts of vehicular manslaughter. I concur with Jeff Schaler's opinion that anybody who kills someone while drunk is fully culpable for those deaths.
"Positive Atheism" Magazine
Material by Cliff Walker (including unsigned editorial commentary) is copyright ©1995-2006 by Cliff Walker. Each submission is copyrighted by its writer, who retains control of the work except that by submitting it to Positive Atheism, permission has been granted to use the material or an edited version: (1) on the Positive Atheism web site; (2) in Positive Atheism Magazine; (3) in subsequent works controlled by Cliff Walker or Positive Atheism Magazine (including published or posted compilations). Excerpts not exceeding 500 words are allowed provided the proper copyright notice is affixed. Other use requires permission; Positive Atheism will work to protect the rights of all who submit their writings to us.